This reconstitutes basic and important aspects of church activities

Abstract

Paul Downes (Downes, 2003), in his commentary on    Heidegger    argues    that    a    comprehensive understanding  of  Ultimate  transcendence  cannot be  resolved  by  any  logical  principle  drawn  from science  and  technology,  except  one  of  existence: the  interactive  one.  Ultimate  transcendence  is  an ontological    (existential)    foundation    for    the understanding of human nature, where we achieve authentic human subjectivity and understanding of ourselves;  our  existence  is  not  found  in  a  mere human ontic aspiration   as   its   form   of   self-definition.  Without  Ultimate  transcendence,  we lose  the  pulling  and  unifying  force  that  integrates us as humans, opening us to the limitless future of our  existence  that  is  not  to  be  bound  and  defined by  the  logic  of  science  and  technology.  Anthony Ichuloi  (2016)  postulates  that  to undermine  the Ultimate  Transcendent  leads  the  modern  subject into  two  possibilities:  either  to  be  totally  doomed in  life  or  to  believe  so  much  in  herself,  in  her science and technology and feel that she is living a „superhuman‟ level of being. This is the illusion of both science and technology; it is an illusion in the sense  that  if  there  are  basic  human  facts  that  are beyond  the  domain  of  science  and  technology.